Canon Ef 100-400Mm Vs Sigma 150-600Mm: What’s the DIFFERENCE?

There are a few Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM vs Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM Contemporary lenses out there, and they both have their pros and cons. The Canon lens is lighter and has image stabilization, while the Sigma lens is weather resistant and has a longer zoom range. Ultimately, it depends on your needs as a photographer as to which lens is right for you.

When it comes to choosing a telephoto zoom lens, there are many factors to consider. But one of the most important choices you’ll make is between the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM and the Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM | Contemporary lenses. These two lenses are both excellent choices for anyone looking for a telephoto zoom lens, but which one is right for you?

Here’s a look at some of the key differences between these two lenses: Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM: -Focal length: 100-400mm

-Maximum aperture: f/4.5-5.6 -Minimum aperture: f/32 -Lens construction: 23 elements in 18 groups (1 Fluorite and 1 UD element)

Canon 100-400 II vs Sigma 150-600 Sport & Tamron 150-600

Which of These Lenses is Better for Wildlife Photography

In short, there is no definitive answer as to which lens is better for wildlife photography. It depends on a variety of factors, such as the type of animal you’re photographing, the distance between you and the animal, the lighting conditions and your personal preferences. If you’re photographing small animals or birds, then a telephoto lens will allow you to get close-up shots without disturbing the animal.

A wide-angle lens can be useful for capturing the environment in which the animal lives or for getting creative shots that include both the animal and its surroundings. It’s important to remember that even though a telephoto lens has a longer focal length and can magnify an image, it also has a narrower field of view. This means that you may have to crop your images more when using a telephoto lens, which can reduce image quality.

As always, experimentation is key in finding out what works best for you and your subject matter. There is no substitute for getting out there and trying different lenses until you find the one that gives you the results you’re looking for.

Which of These Lenses is Better for Landscape Photography

If you’re looking for the best lens for landscape photography, there’s no clear cut answer. It depends on a number of factors, including what type of camera you’re using, what kind of landscapes you’re shooting, and your own personal preferences. That said, here are a few lenses that are popular among landscape photographers:

-Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM: A wide-angle lens that’s great for capturing sweeping vistas.

-Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED: Another excellent choice for wide-angle landscape photography.

-Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM: A versatile option that can be used for everything from close up shots to wide angles.

-Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art Lens: Another good all around option that covers a wide range of focal lengths.

Which of These Lenses is Better for Low Light Photography

There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on a number of factors, such as the type of camera you are using, the aperture of the lens, and your personal preferences. However, we can narrow it down to two main types of lenses that are typically used for low light photography: fast prime lenses and wide-aperture zoom lenses. Fast prime lenses are ideal for low light photography because they have a large maximum aperture, which allows more light to reach the sensor.

This results in less noise and sharper images. Prime lenses also tend to be lighter and more compact than zoom lenses, making them easier to carry around. Wide-aperture zoom lenses are another good option for low light photography.

They offer the flexibility of a zoom lens while still allowing ample light into the camera. Many modern cameras have image stabilization technology built-in, which helps reduce blurriness when shooting in lowlight conditions.

What are the Main Differences between These Two Lenses

There are a few key differences between these two types of lenses. First, telephoto lenses have a much longer focal length than standard lenses. This means that they can magnify objects at a distance, making them great for things like wildlife or sports photography.

Standard lenses have shorter focal lengths and are better suited for everyday photography, like portraits or landscapes. Another difference is that telephoto lenses tend to be much more expensive than standard ones. This is because they require more glass and better quality materials in order to achieve their long focal lengths.

Standard lenses are less expensive because they use less glass and don’t need to be as high quality in order to work well. Finally, telephoto lenses are typically heavier and larger than standard lenses. This is another side effect of their longer focal length; there’s just more glass and material overall.

If you’re looking for a lighter lens to carry around, a standard lens would be the way to go.

Canon Ef 100-400Mm Vs Sigma 150-600Mm


Canon 100-400 Ii Vs Sigma 150-600 Sport

There are many differences between the Canon 100-400 II and Sigma 150-600 Sport lenses. For starters, the Sigma is nearly twice the length and weight of the Canon. The Sigma also has a much wider field of view, making it better suited for wildlife and landscape photography.

However, the Canon has a faster autofocus system and is weather sealed, making it a better choice for sports and action photography.


There are many factors to consider when choosing the right telephoto lens for your needs, and in this blog post we compare the Canon EF 100-400mm vs Sigma 150-600mm lenses. Both lenses have their pros and cons, so it’s important to decide which features are most important to you before making a purchase. The Canon EF 100-400mm is a great choice for those who need a versatile lens that can be used for both close-up and distant subjects.

It has excellent image quality and is very sharp, even at 400mm. However, it is significantly more expensive than the Sigma 150-600mm lens. The Sigma 150-600mm is a good choice for those on a budget who still want a high-quality telephoto lens.

It’s not as sharp as the Canon EF 100-400mm at long distances, but it’s much cheaper and still produces great images. Ultimately, the decision of which lens to buy depends on your individual needs and preferences.

Another Post:

Leave a Comment