Metabones Mark Iv Vs Sigma Mc-11: Main Differences

When it comes to choosing the right adapter for your Sony mirrorless camera, there are two main options on the market: the Metabones Mark IV and the Sigma MC-11. Both adapters have their own unique set of features, so it’s important to know which one is right for you before making a purchase.

Sigma MC-11 vs Metabones IV || for Sony

When it comes to choosing between the Metabones Mark IV and Sigma MC-11, there are a few things to consider. Both adapters offer excellent compatibility with a variety of lenses, but there are some key differences that may make one a better choice for you than the other. The Metabones Mark IV offers a more complete lens mount adapter solution.

It includes both an EF to E mount adapter as well as an EF to RF mount adapter in one package. This means that it’s compatible not only with Sony E mount cameras, but also with Canon’s new line of mirrorless cameras. The Sigma MC-11, on the other hand, is only compatible with Sony E mount cameras.

Another difference is that the Metabones Mark IV supports in-camera stabilization, while the Sigma MC-11 does not. This means that if your camera has in-body stabilization (like many Sony cameras do), you’ll be able to take advantage of it when using lenses that don’t have their own stabilization built in. Finally, the Metabones Mark IV is slightly cheaper than the Sigma MC-11.

So if price is a factor in your decision making process, it may be worth considering the Metabones over the Sigma.

Sigma Mc-11 Compatible Canon Lenses List

Sigma’s MC-11 mount converter/lens adapter allows Canon EF-mount lenses to be used on Sony E-mount cameras. The list of compatible Canon lenses is as follows: Canon EF 8-15mm f/4L USM Fisheye

Metabones Mark Iv Vs Sigma Mc-11


What is the Difference between the Metabones Mark Iv And Sigma Mc-11

When it comes to lenses, there are a lot of different options and variables to consider. But two of the most popular lens adapters on the market right now are the Metabones Mark IV and Sigma MC-11. So, what’s the difference between these two adapters?

For starters, the Metabones Mark IV is designed for use with Canon EF lenses, while the Sigma MC-11 is designed for use with Sony E-mount cameras. The Mark IV features a built-in electronic iris control and auto-focus support, while the MC-11 does not. Additionally, the Mark IV supports in-camera image stabilization (IS), whereas the MC-11 does not.

And finally, the Metabones adapter is slightly larger and heavier than the Sigma adapter. So, which one should you choose? Well, it really depends on your needs and preferences.

If you need or want electronic iris control or in-camera image stabilization, then go with the Metabones Mark IV. However, if you don’t need those features and you prefer a smaller and lighter adapter, then go with the Sigma MC-11.

Which One is Better for Use With Sony E Mount Lenses

A7III or A6600 When it comes to choosing between the Sony A7III and the A6600, there are a few things to consider. Both cameras are great for use with Sony E mount lenses, but each has its own advantages and disadvantages.

The Sony A7III is a full-frame camera, meaning that it has a larger sensor than the A6600. This gives you more flexibility when shooting, as you can make use of the entire frame without having to worry about cropping your images. The downside of this is that full-frame cameras tend to be more expensive than APS-C models like the A6600.

The A6600 also has a slightly higher megapixel count than the A7III, at 24.2MP versus 24MP. This means that you’ll be able to capture slightly more detail in your photos with the A6600. However, both cameras have excellent image quality, so this isn’t likely to be a major factor in your decision.

Finally, one key difference between these two cameras is their autofocus systems. The Sony A7III uses an contrast-detection autofocus system, while the A6600 features phase-detection autofocus on its sensor. This means that the latter will typically be faster and more accurate when focusing on moving subjects.

If you’re planning on doing a lot of action photography, then the A6600 may be a better option for you. Overall, both the Sony A7III and the A6600 are great choices for use with E mount lenses. It really comes down to personal preference and what type of photography you plan on doing most often.

What are the Pros And Cons of Each Adapter

When it comes to choosing the right adapters for your devices, there are a few things to consider. Here are some pros and cons of the most popular types of adapters: USB-C:

Pros: USB-C is becoming more and more common, so it’s likely that you’ll be able to find one that works with your device. They’re also usually smaller and more compact than other types of adapters. Cons: USB-C adapters can be more expensive than other types.

They can also be difficult to find if you don’t know where to look. Lightning: Pros: Lightning connectors are small and easy to use.

They’re also widely compatible with Apple products. Cons: Lightning cables can be expensive, and they only work with Apple products. Micro USB:

Pros: Micro USB is one of the most popular types of connectors, so it’s easy to find an adapter that works with your device. They’re also relatively inexpensive. Cons: Micro USB connectors can be difficult to insert into some devices.

They’re also not as fast as some other types of connectors (like USB 3.0).

More Articles:


The Metabones Mark IV and Sigma MC-11 are two popular adapters that allow you to use Canon lenses on Sony mirrorless cameras. Both adapters have their pros and cons, so it’s important to choose the right one for your needs. The Metabones Mark IV is more expensive than the Sigma MC-11, but it offers better build quality and autofocus performance.

The Sigma MC-11 is less expensive and doesn’t offer as good build quality or autofocus performance, but it’s compatible with a wider range of lenses.

Leave a Comment