Nikon 18 300mm Vs Tamron 16-300mm – Difference and Comparison

When it comes to choosing a lens for your Nikon DSLR, the options can be overwhelming. There are so many different brands and models to choose from, and each has its own unique set of features. Two of the most popular lenses on the market right now are the Nikon 18-300mm and Tamron 16-300mm.

So, which one is the best option for you? Both lenses are incredibly versatile, with a wide range of focal lengths that make them ideal for everything from landscape photography to portraits. The Nikon 18-300mm is slightly lighter and smaller than the Tamron 16-300mm, making it a good choice if you’re looking for a lens that’s easy to carry around.

However, the Tamron lens has a slightly wider field of view and is better suited for close-up shots.

If you’re in the market for a new all-in-one zoom lens, you might be wondering which one to choose. The Nikon 18-300mm and the Tamron 16-300mm are both great choices, but which one is right for you? Here’s a comparison of the two lenses to help you make your decision:

Nikon 18-300mm: – Aperture range: f/3.5-6.3 – Minimum focus distance: 1.48m (4.86 ft)

– Weight: 755g (1.67 lb) Tamron 16-300mm:

Sigma 18-300 Review vs Tamron 16-300

What is the Difference between Nikon 18 300 And Tamron 16 300

There is a significant difference between the Nikon 18-300mm and Tamron 16-300mm lenses. The Nikon lens is a much newer model, released in 2015. It is also significantly more expensive than the Tamron lens.

The main reason for this price difference is that the Nikon lens has a higher zoom range, going from 18mm to 300mm. The Tamron lens only goes up to 16-300mm. This gives the Nikon lens a wider field of view and makes it better suited for capturing distant subjects.

The Tamron lens does have a slightly wider aperture range, however, which might be important for some photographers.

It is Also Slightly Lighter

Aluminium foil is made from an aluminum alloy which contains between 92 and 99 percent aluminum. Usually between 0.00017 and 0.0059 inches thick, foil is produced in many widths and strengths for literally hundreds of applications. It can be used to wrap food, line cookware, make electrical capacitors, insulate pipes, and much more.

The most common aluminum alloy used for making foil is 1145 aluminium alloy. This alloy has good formability and corrosion resistance properties, making it ideal for the food packaging industry where it is used to wrapping food products such as chocolate bars and cigarettes. Aluminium foil provides a complete barrier to light, oxygen, moisture and bacteria.

For this reason, it is used extensively in food packaging where it acts as a barrier to prevent spoilage of packaged foods due to oxidation or moisture.. Aluminium foil does not provide electrical conductivity so it is often used to line oven cavities during the baking process.


Nikon 18 300 Vs Tamron 16 300


Nikon 18-300 Vs Sigma 18-300 Vs Tamron 16-300

When it comes to all-in-one lenses, the Nikon 18-300mm VR II, Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM | C and Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro are all great choices. But which one is right for you? Here’s a closer look at each lens to help you make your decision:

The Nikon 18-300mm VR II is a versatile lens that offers great image quality and zoom range. It’s a good choice for those who want an all-in-one lens that can do it all, from wide angle shots to telephoto close ups. The only downside is the price tag, which is higher than the other two lenses on this list.

The Sigma 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 DC MACRO OS HSM | C is another great all-in-one lens option. It’s slightly cheaper than the Nikon lens and offers similar image quality and zoom range. It’s a good choice for those who want an all-inclusive lens but don’t want to spend as much money as the Nikon option costs.

The Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Macro is the most affordable option of the three lenses listed here.

More Post:


In terms of zoom range, the Nikon 18-300mm is a clear winner over the Tamron 16-300mm. With an extra 50mm of reach on the telephoto end, the 18-300mm can get you closer to your subject without having to move as much. This can be especially useful for wildlife and sports photography, where getting close to your subject is often not possible.

The Nikon 18-300mm also has a slightly wider field of view at the wide end (18mm vs 20mm), which can come in handy for landscape and architectural photography. Finally, the 18-300mm has a slightly faster maximum aperture (f/3.5 vs f/3.8), which means it will perform better in low light situations and produce shallower depth of field effects.

Leave a Comment