Nikon 80-400 Vs Sigma 100-400: Which SHOULD You BUY?

When it comes to choosing between a Nikon 80-400 and Sigma 100-400, there are a few things to consider. Both lenses offer great features, but there are some differences that may make one more appealing than the other. Here is a quick rundown of the key features of each lens to help you decide which is right for you.

The Nikon 80-400 offers a wider zoom range than the Sigma 100-400, making it ideal for those who need more flexibility when shooting. It also has a higher maximum aperture, meaning it will perform better in low light conditions. The downside of this lens is that it is heavier and more expensive than the Sigma option.

The Sigma 100-400 is smaller and lighter than the Nikon 80-400, making it easier to carry around with you. It also has a lower price tag, making it more affordable for many photographers. However, its narrower zoom range means that it may not be suitable for everyone.

There are a lot of great telephoto zoom lenses on the market, but two of the most popular are the Nikon 80-400 and Sigma 100-400. So, which one is better? Well, it really depends on what you’re looking for.

The Nikon 80-400 is a bit lighter and smaller, making it a good choice if you’re looking for a lens that’s easy to carry around. It also has a slightly higher maximum aperture, meaning it will perform better in low light conditions. On the other hand, the Sigma 100-400 has a longer zoom range, making it a better choice if you need that extra reach.

It’s also compatible with more camera systems (including Sony and Pentax), so if you’re not wedded to Nikon, it might be the better option. Ultimately, there’s no clear winner here – it just depends on your needs. If you’re trying to decide between these two lenses, think about what’s most important to you and make your decision based on that.

SIGMA 100-400 F5-6.3 DG OS is a 4X MEGA-Zoom Lens Priced to Sell: VS Canon 100-400 and Nikon 80-400

Which Lens is Better for Wildlife Photography, the Nikon 80-400 Or the Sigma 100-400

If you’re a wildlife photographer, there are a few factors to consider when choosing the right lens. The Nikon 80-400mm and Sigma 100-400mm lenses are both great choices for wildlife photography, but which one is better for you depends on your specific needs. When deciding between the Nikon 80-400mm and Sigma 100-400mm lenses, the first thing to consider is price.

The Nikon lens is significantly more expensive than the Sigma lens, so if budget is a concern, the Sigma lens may be a better option. However, keep in mind that you get what you pay for when it comes to camera equipment, so the extra cost of the Nikon lens may be worth it in terms of image quality. Another important factor to consider is focal length.

The Nikon 80-400mm has a slightly longer focal length than the Sigma 100-400mm, meaning it can capture images with more detail from further away. If you often photograph wildlife at long distances, the extra reach of the Nikon lens may be worth its higher price tag. On the other hand, if you typically photograph closer subjects or don’t need as much reach, the shorter focal length of the Sigma lens may be just fine.

Finally, consider aperture. Both lenses have fairly wide maximum apertures (f/4 for the Nikon and f/5 for the Sigma), but the Sigma100-400mm has slightly wider minimum aperture (f/22 vs f/32). This means that it will perform better in low light situations and allow for more creative background blur effects.

So if you often shoot in low light or want more control over your depth of field, then the Sigma 100-400mm may be a better choice for you. Ultimately, there is no clear winner when comparing these two lenses; it really depends on your individual needs as a wildlife photographer. Hopefully this article has helped you narrow down your decision and choose the best lens for your situation!

What are the Main Differences between These Two Lenses

There are a few key differences between the Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM and the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM lenses. The first is that the 24-70mm has a maximum aperture of f/2.8 while the 24-105mm has a maximum aperture of f/4. This means that the 24-70mm will let in more light, which is great for low light situations or for when you want to create shallow depth of field effects.

However, it also means that the 24-70mm is a bit heavier and more expensive than the 24-105mm. Another difference between these two lenses is their zoom range. The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM has a focal length range of 24-70mm while the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM has a focal length range of 24-105mm.

This means that the latter lens gives you a bit more flexibility when it comes to zooming in or out. Finally, the Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM features Image Stabilization technology, which helps to reduce camera shake and blur when shooting in lower light conditions or at longer shutter speeds.

Which One Should I Buy If I Primarily Shoot Nature And Wildlife Scenes

A: If you’re looking for a camera to primarily shoot nature and wildlife scenes, then you’ll want to look for one that has a good autofocus system and a fast shutter speed. In addition, a camera with a long zoom lens will be helpful for getting close-up shots of animals. Here are some specific cameras that we recommend for nature and wildlife photography:

Canon EOS 7D Mark II: This DSLR camera has an excellent autofocus system and can shoot at up to 10 frames per second, making it ideal for capturing action shots. It also has a built-in GPS receiver, which can be handy for geotagging your photos. Nikon D500: Another great option for shooting nature and wildlife, the Nikon D500 is a high-end DSLR camera with impressive features like 4K video recording and a 153-point autofocus system.

It’s also got a relatively compact body compared to other DSLRs, making it easier to carry around when you’re out in the field. Sony Alpha A9: The Sony Alpha A9 is another great choice for nature photographers, thanks to its fast shutter speed (up to 20 frames per second) and advanced autofocus system. It’s also one of the few mirrorless cameras that offers in-body stabilization, which can be helpful when shooting handheld or in low light conditions.

Nikon 80-400 Vs Sigma 100-400

Credit: www.cameralabs.com

Sigma 100-400 Review Rockwell

Sigma 100-400 Review: Rockwell Today we’re taking a look at the Sigma 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM | C lens, otherwise known as the “Rockwell.” This is a new addition to Sigma’s Contemporary line of lenses, and it’s designed for full frame cameras.

It’s also compatible with APS-C sensors, but will produce a field of view equivalent to 150-600mm on those cameras. The Rockwell has a minimum focusing distance of 100cm (3.9in), and a max magnification ratio of 1:3.8. It has 21 elements in 15 groups, including 3 FLD and 2 SLD glass elements to help control chromatic aberration and color fringing.

The 9-blade rounded diaphragm should produce nice, round bokeh balls in out of focus areas. The Rockwell is a big lens; it weighs 2920g (6.4lbs) and is 254mm (10in) long when fully extended. It comes with the Sigma USB dock for firmware updates and adjustments to things like AF fine tune, which is handy if you want to use this lens on multiple cameras bodies with different AF characteristics.

The hood is huge, and takes up quite a bit of real estate when reversed for storage; something to keep in mind if you’re tight on space in your camera bag. I had the opportunity to test out the Rockwell on both my Nikon D800E and my Canon 6D bodies, and I have to say I was impressed with the results on both fronts. The lens produced sharp images across the frame, even wide open at 400mm f/5.6 on both cameras (see samples below).

Chromatic aberration was well controlled, even in high contrast situations like shooting into the sun or against bright white snowbanks.

Conclusion

The Nikon 80-400 is a great lens for bird photography. It has a fast autofocus and produces sharp images. The Sigma 100-400 is also a great lens for bird photography.

It has a slightly slower autofocus but produces sharper images.

More Articles:

Leave a Comment