The Olympus OM-1 and the Olympus OM-10 are two cameras that were released by Olympus in the 1970s. The OM-1 was released in 1972, while the OM-10 was released in 1979. Both cameras are 35mm film cameras.
The main difference between the two cameras is that the OM-1 has a manual wind lever, while the OM-10 does not. Other than that, both cameras have similar features and functions.
The Olympus OM-1 was first introduced in 1972, and the OM-10 followed in 1979. Both cameras were designed by Yoshihisa Maitani, and both are considered to be classic examples of Japanese camera design. The OM-1 is a manual focus SLR with a metal body and interchangeable lenses, while the OM-10 is an autofocus model with a plastic body and fixed lens.
So, which one is better? There is no simple answer to this question. Both cameras have their fans, and each has its own strengths and weaknesses.
If you’re looking for a classic manual focus camera, then the OM-1 is probably the better choice. But if you prefer the convenience of autofocus, then the OM-10 might be a better option. Ultimately, it’s up to you to decide which camera suits your needs best.
OMG! Olympus OM SLRs – Buyer’s Guide
Is Om1 Better Than Om10?
There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on individual needs and preferences. Some people may prefer OM1 for its lower price point, while others may find that OM10 offers better value for money. Ultimately, the best way to decide which option is right for you is to try both and see which one suits your needs best.
How Good is the Olympus Om-1?
Assuming you are asking about the Olympus OM-1 35mm film camera, released in 1972:
The Olympus OM-1 is a 35mm single-lens reflex (SLR) camera. It was designed to be compact and lightweight, with clean lines and a sleek appearance.
The OM-1 was the first SLRcamera from Olympus to use the company’s unique Zuiko lenses, which are renowned for their sharpness and clarity. The camera itself is very well made, with all metal construction and solid feel. The shutter is extremely quiet and smooth, making it a great choice for candid or street photography.
The viewfinder is large and bright, with excellent coverage. The controls are all logically laid out and easy to use. Overall, the Olympus OM-1 is an excellent 35mm SLR camera that is ideal for anyone looking for a high quality yet affordable option.
It offers superb build quality, excellent optics, and reliable performance.
What is the Difference between the Olympus Om-1 And Om 2?
Released in 1972, the Olympus OM-1 was the company’s first SLR camera. It was a groundbreaking model that helped establish Olympus as a leading player in the camera market. The OM-1 was followed by the OM-2 in 1975, which added some important features and improvements.
The most notable difference between the two cameras is that the OM-2 has an electronically controlled shutter, while the OM-1 has a mechanical shutter. This gives the OM-2 a major advantage in terms of speed and accuracy. The OM-2 can also be used with motorized winders and remote triggers, making it ideal for action photography.
Other differences include: The OM-2 has a hot shoe for flash units, while the OM-1 does not. The viewfinder on the OM-2 is brighter and easier to use than on the older model.
The film advance lever on theOM-2 is shorter and less likely to cause accidental advances when carrying the camera around your neck.
Is Olympus Om-1 Good for Beginners?
Olympus OM-1 is a 35mm SLR camera that was introduced in 1972. It was the first camera in Olympus’ OM series, and it established the company as a serious player in the world of photography. The OM-1 was designed to be small, lightweight, and easy to use, and it quickly became a favorite among amateur and professional photographers alike.
Today, the Olympus OM-1 is considered to be a classic camera, and its design has influenced many subsequent cameras from Olympus and other manufacturers. While it may not have all the bells and whistles of today’s digital cameras, the OM-1 is still a great option for beginners who want to learn about photography with a manual film camera. Its simple controls make it easy to learn the basics of exposure settings, while its compact size makes it easy to carry around.
And if you’re feeling adventurous, there are plenty of accessories available for the OM-1 that can help you expand your creativity.
Olympus Om-1 Vs Om-2
When comparing the Olympus OM-1 vs OM-2, there are a few key areas to consider. The first is sensor size. The OM-1 has a smaller sensor than the OM-2, so it’s not as good at capturing large amounts of light.
This can be an issue in low light situations or when trying to capture fast moving subjects. The second area to consider is autofocus. The OM-1 uses a contrast detect autofocus system, while the OM-2 uses phase detection.
This means that the OM-2 will be faster and more accurate when focusing, especially in low light or when tracking moving subjects. Finally, battery life is also worth considering. The OM-1 uses AA batteries, while the OM-2 uses a proprietary lithium ion battery.
This means that theOM-2 will last longer on a single charge, but it’s also more expensive to replace if you need to.
The Olympus OM-1 was introduced in 1972 as the company’s first professional-level single-lens reflex camera. The OM-10 followed in 1979 as a more affordable option for amateur photographers. Both cameras were designed with compactness and portability in mind, and they remain popular choices for film shooters today.
The biggest difference between the two cameras is that the OM-1 has a metal body, while the OM-10 is made of plastic. The OM-1 is also slightly smaller and lighter than the OM-10. Other than that, they share many of the same features, including a shutter speed range of 1/1000 to 1 second, an aperture range of f/1.4 to f/16, and manual or automatic exposure control.
So, which camera is right for you? If you’re looking for a rugged and reliable camera that will last a lifetime, go with the Olympus OM-1. But if you’re on a budget and don’t mind sacrificing a little bit of build quality, the OM-10 may be a better option.