Sigma 14-24 Vs Sony 16-35 Gm – Here’s How to Make Your Choice!

There’s a lot of debate in the photography world about which ultra-wide angle zoom lens is better, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG HSM Art or the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM? They’re both great lenses, but there are some key differences that might make one a better choice for you than the other. Here’s a quick rundown of each lens and how they compare:

The Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG HSM Art is a wide angle zoom lens with a constant maximum aperture of f/2.8 throughout its zoom range. It’s designed for full frame cameras, but can also be used on APS-C sensors with an equivalent field of view of 21-36mm. The build quality is excellent, with a metal barrel and weather sealing to keep out dust and moisture.

The autofocus is fast and quiet, making it great for video as well as stills. One downside is that it doesn’t have image stabilization, so you’ll need to use a tripod or keep your shutter speed fast to avoid camera shake if using it handheld. The Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM is another excellent option for an ultra wide angle zoom lens.

It covers a slightly wider field of view on full frame cameras at 16-35mm, making it ideal for landscape and architectural photography. Like the Sigma 14-24mm, it has a constant maximum aperture of f/2.8 throughout its zoom range and produces beautiful images with superb sharpness and colors thanks to Sony’s G Master series optics.

When it comes to wide-angle lenses, there are two main competitors: the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art and the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM. Both of these lenses are extremely sharp, have great build quality, and offer a fast aperture of f/2.8. So, which one is better?

Well, it really depends on what you’re looking for. If you need the absolute widest field of view possible, then the Sigma 14-24mm is the way to go. However, if you’re looking for a slightly narrower field of view with less distortion, then the Sony 16-35mm might be a better option.

Ultimately, it’s up to you to decide which lens suits your needs best.

Sigma 14-24mm Art Lens VS Sony 16-35mm G Master Lens // Sony A7 III A7R III A7R IV

Which One is Better?

Blogging or Vlogging This is a difficult question to answer as both blogging and vlogging have their own advantages and disadvantages. If you are trying to decide which one is better for you, it really depends on your individual goals and preferences.

Here is a quick overview of each option: Blogging:

Pros:

-Can be done from anywhere with an internet connection -No expensive equipment needed -Relatively easy to set up and get started

-Can be very personal and intimate, allowing you to share your thoughts and experiences in great detail -Great way to build an audience around a specific topic or niche.

Cons:

-Takes more time to produce than a vlog (unless you are just writing short posts) -Requires more effort to promoting your content (SEO, social media, etc.) in order to reach a larger audience

What are the Main Differences between These Two Lenses

There are a few key differences between the two lenses. The first is that the 50mm lens has a much wider field of view than the 100mm lens. This means that you can capture more of your surroundings with the 50mm lens, which can be useful for landscape or group shots.

The second difference is that the 100mm lens has a longer focal length, which means it can zoom in on subjects further away than the 50mm lens. This can be handy for wildlife or sports photography, where you need to be able to capture distant objects. Finally, the 100mm lens is generally sharper than the 50mm lens, due to its longer focal length and higher quality construction.

Which One Should I Buy?

Nikon D750 or Canon 6D If you’re a professional photographer, the Nikon D750 is the better choice. It has a higher resolution sensor and faster shooting speed.

However, if you’re an amateur or taking pictures for fun, the Canon 6D is a great choice because it’s less expensive and still takes high quality photos.

Sigma 14-24 Vs Sony 16-35 Gm

Credit: www.cined.com

Sony 12-24 Vs 16-35

If you’re a Sony shooter and in the market for a new ultra-wide angle zoom, you may be wondering whether to choose the Sony 12-24mm f/4 G or the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM. Both lenses are excellent choices, but which one is right for you? In this blog post, we’ll compare the two lenses side-by-side to help you make a decision.

Starting with the basics, the Sony 12-24mm f/4 G is a full frame ultra-wide angle zoom lens that offers a field of view of 122 degrees on full frame cameras. It has a minimum focusing distance of 7.87 inches (20 cm) and a maximum magnification ratio of 0.19x. The lens is also weather sealed to protect against dust and moisture.

The Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM, on the other hand, is also a full frame ultra-wide angle zoom lens but with a slightly narrower field of view of 108 degrees on full frame cameras. It has a minimum focusing distance of 11 inches (28 cm) and a maximum magnification ratio of 0.17x. This lens is not weather sealed however.

So what are the main differences between these two lenses? Well, firstly, there’s the obvious difference in focal length range – 12-24mm vs 16-35mm. This means that if you need that extra bit of reach at the wide end, then the Sony 16-35mm f/2..8

GM is going to be your best bet as it offers 4mm more reach than the 12-24mm f/4 G at its widest setting.. Secondly, there’s also difference in aperture – f/4 vs f/2..8 .

This means that if you need that extra bit of light gathering power or want to shoot with shallower depth of field , then again ,the 16 – 35 mm F 2 . 8 GM will be your better choice . However , keep in mind that because it ‘ s an f / 2 . 8 lens , it ‘s also going to be significantly larger and heavier than its f / 4 counterpart .

Finally , another key difference between these two lenses is image stabilization .

Another Post:

Conclusion

When it comes to wide-angle lenses, the Sigma 14-24 and Sony 16-35 GM are both excellent options. However, there are some key differences between the two lenses that may make one more suitable for your needs than the other. The Sigma 14-24 is a bit wider than the Sony 16-35 GM, making it better suited for landscape photography.

It also has a bit less distortion and produces sharper images overall. On the downside, it is significantly heavier and more expensive than the Sony lens. The Sony 16-35 GM is a great choice if you need a lighter and less expensive lens.

It’s also a good option if you shoot mostly indoors or in tight spaces, as its narrower field of view can be an advantage in these situations. However, it doesn’t perform quite as well as the Sigma 14-24 in terms of image quality.

Leave a Comment