Sigma 14-24Mm F/2.8 Vs Sony 12-24 – Difference and Comparison

When it comes to wide-angle lenses, there are a few options available on the market. However, two of the most popular choices among photographers are the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 and the Sony 12-24mm f/4. Both lenses offer a lot in terms of features and performance, but which one is the better option?

In this article, we’ll take a look at both lenses and compare their strengths and weaknesses to help you make a decision. The Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 is a great choice for photographers who need a fast lens with excellent optics. The lens is also very durable, making it ideal for use in rough conditions.

On the downside, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 is quite heavy and large, making it difficult to carry around all day. The Sony 12-24mm f/4 is a lighter and more compact option that is still able to produce excellent results. However, the slower aperture means that it isn’t well suited for low light photography or action shots.

But if those aren’t priorities for you, then the Sony 12-24mm f/4 could be a great choice.

Sigma 14-24Mm F/2.8 Vs Sony 12-24: Which is the better lens? When it comes to wide angle lenses, there are a few key things to consider – namely, distortion, sharpness, and build quality. In this article, we’re going to pit the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 against the Sony 12-24mm f/4 to see which one comes out on top.

Starting with distortion, both lenses suffer from some barrel distortion at their widest focal lengths – however, the Sigma lens is significantly worse in this regard. At 14mm, the Sigma has around 3% barrel distortion while the Sony only has 1%. This means that straight lines will appear curved when using the Sigma lens at its widest setting – something to keep in mind if you plan on shooting architecture or landscapes.

The story is similar at 24mm – where the Sigma has 2% barrel distortion and the Sony has less than 1%. When it comes to sharpness, both lenses are excellent – although the Sigma does have a slight edge over the Sony. At 14mm and f/2.8, the Sigma produces images that are acceptably sharp across most of the frame with only slight softness towards the edges.

The Sony lens is no slouch either – producing similarly sharp results albeit with slightly more edge softness than the Sigma. At 24mm and f/4, both lenses again produce excellent results with very little difference between them in terms of overall sharpness. However, when pixel-peeping you may notice that images shot withthe Sony tend to be just ever so slightly sharper than those taken withthe Sigma.

In terms of build quality, both lenses feel solid and well-constructed – although neither is weather sealed so take care if using them in inclement conditions. The all-metal construction of both lenses gives them a premium feel whilst also keeping weight down to a minimum – important considerations for anyone wanting to travel light!

The Sony 12-24 F2.8 First Impressions! Better than the Sigma 14-24 F2.8?

Q: What is the Difference between the Sigma 14-24Mm F/2

Art and the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED? When deciding which ultra-wide angle lens is right for you, two of the most popular options on the market are the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art and the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED. So, what’s the difference between these two lenses?

For starters, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art is part of Sigma’s esteemed line of “Art” series lenses, which are known for their exceptional image quality. On the other hand, the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED is a member of Nikon’s high-end “G” series lenses (although it should be noted that Nikon no longer produces new G series lenses). In terms of optics, both lenses feature similar construction with both aspherical and low dispersion elements to minimize distortion and chromatic aberration.

However, where they differ is in their aperture blades: while the Sigma lens has 9 aperture blades for smooth bokeh effects, the Nikon lens only has 7 blades. Additionally,the Sigma lens has a slightly wider field of view at 14mm compared to 13mm on the Nikon lens. When it comes to autofocus performance, both lenses utilize ultrasonic motors for fast and accurate focusing; however, some users have reported that the Sigma lens can be noisy when autofocusing while others find that it operates smoothly and quietly.

On the other hand, there have been no such reports about autofocus noise with the Nikon lens – although some users do find that its autofocus system isn’t quite as snappy as they would like it to be. Finally, in terms of price,the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art retails for around $1,700 while theNikon 14-24mm f/2..87ED goes for closer to $2,200 – makingthe former slightly more affordable than then latter option.

Sony 12-24Mm F2.8

In the market for a new lens? You might be wondering whether to go for the 8 or 12-24mm Sony. Here’s a breakdown of the key differences between these two lenses to help you make your decision:

8mm vs 12-24mm: Focal Length The 8mm lens has a much wider field of view than the 12-24mm lens. This means that it can capture more of a scene in one frame.

If you’re shooting landscapes or architecture, the 8mm will give you those sweeping, panoramic shots that are so impressive. However, the 12-24mm is still a very wide angle lens and will allow you to get creative with your compositions. It’s also worth noting that the extra 4mm of focal length can be useful when shooting in tighter spaces.

8mm vs 12-24mm: Aperture Another key difference between these two lenses is their maximum aperture. The 8mm has a maximum aperture of f/2.8 while the 12-24mm has an f/4 aperture.

This means that the 8mm will let in more light, giving you more flexibility when shooting in low light conditions or wanting to create shallow depth of field effects. However, this comes at the expense of size and weight – the 8mmm is a larger and heavier lens than the 12-24mmm. 8mmm vs 12-24mmm: Image Quality

So which lens should you choose? Ultimately it comes down to what you want to use it for and what tradeoffs you’re willing to make. The 8mmm is great for landscape and architectural photography thanks to its ultra wide field of view.

But if you need something smaller and lighter, with slightly better image quality, then go for the12-24mmm instead.

Sigma 14-24Mm F/2.8 Vs Sony 12-24

Credit: wolfcrow.com

Sigma 14-24Mm F/2.8 Sony Review

Sigma’s 14-24mm F/2.8 Art is one of the most interesting and controversial lenses on the market. It’s a beast of a lens, with excellent optics and build quality, but it also comes with a few caveats. In this review, we’ll take a close look at what this lens has to offer, and whether or not it’s worth the investment.

The Good: • Outstanding optics. The Sigma 14-24mm F/2.8 Art is one of the sharpest lenses available for Sony cameras.

It produces stunning images with great detail and clarity. • Fast autofocus. This lens focuses quickly and accurately, even in low light conditions.

• Rugged construction. The Sigma 14-24mm F/2.8 Art is built like a tank, with high-quality materials that can withstand heavy use. The Bad:

• Heavy and bulky. This lens is big and heavy, making it difficult to carry around all day long. If you’re looking for a compact lens, this isn’t the one for you.

More Read:

Conclusion

The debate between the Sony 12-24mm and the Sigma 14-24mm has been a long one, with many people debating which is the better lens. Both lenses are extremely sharp, but there are some differences between them that may make one more suitable for your needs than the other. The Sony 12-24mm has less distortion and vignetting than the Sigma 14-24mm, but the Sigma lens is significantly cheaper.

If you’re looking for the best possible image quality, then the Sony lens is probably the better choice, but if you’re on a budget then the Sigma lens is a great option.

Leave a Comment