Sigma 14-24Mm F/2.8 Vs Tamron 17-28: What’s the DIFFERENCE?

There is a lot of debate in the photography world about which wide-angle lens is better, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 or the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8. Both lenses have their pros and cons, but ultimately it comes down to personal preference. Here is a breakdown of each lens to help you decide which one is right for you.

The Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 is a popular choice for landscape photographers because of its wide field of view and fast aperture. However, some people find the distortion at the 14mm end to be too much for their taste. The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 is a newer lens that doesn’t have as much distortion at the wide end, but it doesn’t quite reach 14mm on full frame cameras.

When it comes to wide-angle lenses, there are two main contenders in the market – the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 and the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8. Both of these lenses are incredibly popular among landscape and architectural photographers, so which one should you choose? In terms of price, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 is around $200 cheaper than the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8.

However, both lenses are very well built and offer excellent image quality. When it comes to autofocus, both lenses are very fast and accurate. However, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 offers slightly better performance in low light conditions thanks to its Hypersonic Motor technology.

In terms of optics, both lenses are excellent performers. The Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 has 21 elements in 15 groups while the Tamron 17-28mm f/2 Aspheric XLD glass element for reduced chromatic aberration at all focal lengths..

In terms of sharpness, both lenses are extremely sharp – even when used at their widest apertures. However, the Sigma 14-24mm does have a slight edge when it comes to overall image quality thanks to its lower distortion levels and higher resolving power..

When it comes to size and weight,,the Sigma 14=24m is significantly smaller and lighter than teh Tarmon 17=28m lens .The sigma measures 3 inches in diameter and 4 inches in length ,weighing 1 pound 5 ounces .he tamron is larger measuring 3..

4 inchesin diameterand 5./6inches long ,weighing 1 pound 13 ounces ..So if portability is important to you then the sigma would be th ebetter choice ..All things considered ,both lenses offer great value for money and produce outstanding results .

Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART vs Tamron 17-28 for Sony: Review and Comparison

What are the Main Differences between the Sigma 14-24Mm F/2

Art and the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED? When it comes to high quality, wide angle lenses there are really only two contenders–the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED and the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art. Both lenses are incredibly sharp, have very little distortion, and produce beautiful images.

So, what are the differences between these two powerhouse lenses? First off, let’s talk about price. The Nikon lens is significantly more expensive than the Sigma lens–almost $1,000 more expensive.

If price is a major factor in your decision making process, then the Sigma lens is definitely the better option. When it comes to build quality, both lenses are solid and well-built. However, some reviewers have noted that the Sigma lens feels slightly cheaper than the Nikon lens.

This is likely due to the fact that the Nikon lens has weather sealing while the Sigma does not. So, if you’re planning on using this lens in inclement weather conditions, the Nikon may be a better choice for you. Another big difference between these two lenses is autofocus speed and accuracy.

The Nikon lens uses a Silent Wave Motor (SWM) which is extremely fast and accurate–even in low light conditions. The Sigma uses a HSM (Hyper Sonic Motor) which is also fast and accurate but can sometimes hunt for focus in low light situations. So if autofocus speed and accuracy are important to you, go with the Nikon lens .

Finally, let’s talk about image quality–because that’s really what matters most when choosing a Lens , right ? Well , both of these lenses are incredibly sharp across their entire range . They both produce beautiful , vibrant images with minimal distortion .

However , some reviewers have noted that colors tend to be slightly more saturated with the Sigma lens while others find that colors appear truer to life with the Nikon . Ultimately , it comes down to personal preference so we recommend renting or borrowing each lens before making your final decision .

Tamron 17-28Mm Lenses

It can be difficult to choose the right lens- especially when you’re on a budget. In this blog post, we’ll compare the 8 and 17-28mm lenses from Tamron. The 8 is a great all-purpose lens that can be used for a variety of subjects.

It has a wide field of view and is light and compact, making it easy to carry around. The 17-28mm is a great choice for landscape and architectural photography. It has a wide angle of view and produces sharp images.

So, which one should you choose? If you’re looking for an all-purpose lens that won’t break the bank, the 8 is a great option. If you need a wider field of view for landscapes or architecture, then the 17-28mm is the way to go.

Which Lens is Better for Landscape Photography

There is no easy answer when it comes to choosing the best lens for landscape photography. It depends on a variety of factors, such as the type of camera you are using, your personal shooting style, and the specific conditions of the scene you are trying to capture. However, there are a few general tips that can help you make the decision.

If you are using a DSLR camera, then a wide-angle lens is typically going to be your best option for landscape photography. This type of lens allows you to capture more of the scene in front of you, which is ideal for sweeping landscapes. A telephoto lens can also be a good choice for landscape photography, particularly if you want to focus on a specific area or detail within the scene.

When it comes to choosing the right aperture for landscape photography, it is important to strike a balance between maintaining sharpness and foreground/background blur. A good rule of thumb is to choose an aperture that falls somewhere in the middle range of your camera’s options (between f/8 and f/11). This will help ensure that both your foreground and background elements are nicely blurred, while still keeping everything in focus.

Finally, remember that light plays a huge role in any landscape photograph. Try to shoot during golden hour (the hour before sunset or after sunrise) for softer, warmer light that will beautifully illuminate your scene.

Which Lens is Better for Astrophotography

There is no definitive answer when it comes to which lens is better for astrophotography. It really depends on the specific situation and what you are trying to capture. For example, a wide-angle lens will be better for capturing an entire nebula, while a telephoto lens will be better for picking out individual stars.

Ultimately, it is up to the photographer to decide which lens will work best for their particular needs.

Which Lens Has Less Distortion

There are a few different types of lenses that can be used on a camera, and each one has its own advantages and disadvantages. One type of lens is the telephoto lens, which has a long focal length and is great for taking pictures of distant objects. However, telephoto lenses can suffer from a lot of distortion, especially at the edges of the frame.

Another type of lens is the wide-angle lens, which has a shorter focal length and is great for taking pictures of large scenes or groups of people. However, wide-angle lenses can also suffer from distortion, although not as much as telephoto lenses. So, which type of lens has less distortion?

It really depends on the specific situation and what you’re trying to take a picture of. If you’re trying to take a picture of something far away, then a telephoto lens might be your best option despite the distortion. However, if you’re trying to take a picture of something close up or in a large group, then a wide-angle lens might be your best option despite the slight amount of distortion.

Sigma 14-24Mm F/2.8 Vs Tamron 17-28

Credit: dustinabbott.net

Sigma 17-28

Sigma 17-28 is a high quality, fast aperture zoom lens for Canon DSLRs. It has a maximum aperture of f/2.8 and a focal length of 17-28mm. The lens is constructed with 14 elements in 11 groups, and features two aspherical and four FLD glass elements to minimize chromatic aberration, distortion, and other optical aberrations.

The Sigma 17-28 also has a Super Multi-Layer Coating to reduce flare and ghosting. This lens is ideal for landscape, architectural, and event photography.

More Read:

Conclusion

There are a lot of things to consider when choosing between the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 and the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 lenses. Both lenses are great for landscape and astrophotography, but there are some key differences to keep in mind. For one, the Sigma 14-24mm has a slightly wider field of view, which can be helpful for getting more of the scene in your frame.

Additionally, the Sigma lens has a slightly faster maximum aperture, meaning it will perform better in low light situations. However, the Tamron lens is lighter and less expensive, making it a more attractive option for some photographers. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what you value most in a lens.

Leave a Comment