Sony 16-35 2.8 Vs Tamron 17-28: Main Differences

There’s a lot of debate in the photography world about which is better, the Sony 16-35 2.8 or the Tamron 17-28. Both lenses are great for wide angle shots, but they have their own individual strengths and weaknesses. Here’s a breakdown of how each lens performs so you can decide which one is right for you.

There’s a lot of debate out there about which wide-angle lens is better for Sony shooters, the Sony 16-35 2.8 or the Tamron 17-28. Both lenses are great choices for anyone looking to get into wide-angle photography, but there are some key differences between them that you should be aware of before making your decision. The Sony 16-35 2.8 is a bit wider than the Tamron 17-28, giving you a little extra field of view.

It’s also a bit sharper overall, and has less distortion at the edges of the frame. On the downside, it’s a bit more expensive than the Tamron lens and doesn’t have image stabilization (IS). The Tamron 17-28 is a good choice if you’re looking to save some money, as it’s significantly less expensive than the Sony lens.

It also has IS built in, which can be helpful when shooting in low light or handholding your camera for long exposures. The tradeoff is that it’s not quite as sharp as the Sony lens and has slightly more distortion at the edges of the frame. So which one should you choose?

Ultimately it comes down to what your priorities are and how much you’re willing to spend. If money is no object and you want the absolute best image quality possible, go with the Sony 16-35 2.8.

Is Tamron 17-28mm BETTER Than Sony GM 16-35mm?! | $900 VS $2200

Sony 16-35 2.8 and Tamron 17-28 Which One is Better?

There is no easy answer when it comes to choosing between two options. It depends on what you value most and what your priorities are. If you’re trying to decide between two different things, ask yourself these questions:

– What are the pros and cons of each option? – Which option is more in line with my values? – What are the long-term consequences of each choice?

– Which option will make me happier? – Which option is more practical? – Which option has less risk involved?

Tamron 17-28 DSLR

When it comes to ultrawide-angle zoom lenses for DSLRs, there are really only two main options: the Canon 8-15mm f/4L USM and the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD. Both of these lenses offer excellent image quality and build quality, but which one is right for you? Let’s start with the Canon 8-15mm f/4L USM.

This lens is a beast, weighing in at 1.1kg (nearly 2.5lbs). It’s also quite expensive, with a retail price of around $2,000 USD. But what you get for that money is a truly exceptional piece of glass.

The image quality from this lens is simply outstanding, with superb sharpness and very little distortion. It’s also weather-sealed, making it perfect for shooting in challenging conditions. The only real downside to this lens is its size and weight; it’s just not very practical to carry around all day long.

If you’re looking for something a bit more manageable, then take a look at the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD . This lens weighs in at just over half a kilogram (1lb), making it much easier to carry around with you. It’s also significantly cheaper than the Canon 8-15mm, retailing for around $1,200 USD .

Despite being less expensive and lighter weight, the Tamron 17-28mm still delivers excellent image quality; it’s just not quite on par with the Canon 8-15mm . Another downside of this lens is that it’s not weather sealed , so you’ll need to be careful when using it in wet or dusty conditions . So which one should you buy?

If money is no object and you want the absolute best image quality possible , go for the Canon 8-15mm f/4L USM . However , if you’re on a budget or simply don’t want to carry around such a heavy lens , then the Tamron 17 – 28mm f / 2 .8 Di III RXD is definitely worth considering .

What are the Main Differences between These Two Lenses

There are a few key differences between these two types of lenses. First, wide-angle lenses have a much wider field of view than normal lenses. This is because they have a shorter focal length, which allows them to capture more of the scene in front of them.Wide-angle lenses are also often used for landscape photography, as they can help to capture the vastness of a scene.

Normal lenses, on the other hand, have a narrower field of view and are better suited for portraits or close-up shots. Another difference between these two types of lenses is that wide-angle lenses tend to distort images more than normal lenses. This is because their shorter focal length causes objects to appear further away from the center of the frame than they actually are.

This can be both an advantage and a disadvantage, depending on the effect you’re trying to achieve with your photos.

Sony 16-35 2.8 VS Tamron 17-28 Which One Should I Buy

A Kindle or a Nook? When you’re trying to decide between buying a Kindle or a Nook, there are a few things you’ll want to keep in mind. Both devices have their own pros and cons, so it’s important to weigh your options before making a purchase.

Kindle Pros: – Amazon has a larger selection of ebooks than Barnes & Noble, so you’ll have more titles to choose from. – The Kindle is lighter and smaller than the Nook, making it more portable.

– The battery life on the Kindle is longer than the Nook’s battery life. – You can connect to the internet with the Kindle using Wi-Fi or 3G (depending on which model you buy), while the Nook only has Wi-Fi connectivity. – With an Amazon Prime account, you can borrow books from the Kindle Lending Library for free.

Kindle Cons: – Unlike the Nook, Kindles cannot play MP3 files or display PDF documents natively – you need to convert these file types first before transferring them onto your device. Nook Pros:

– The Nook has a built-in memory card slot – this means that you can expand its storage capacity by inserting an SD card (up to 32GB). The Kindle does not have this feature. – Unlike the Kindle, which uses E Ink technology, the Nook uses LCD screens for its displays.

This means that color images will appear sharper and clearer on the Nook than they would on a Kindle. However, LCD screens can also be harder on your eyes when reading for long periods of time compared to E Ink screens. Nook Cons:

– Like we mentioned before, Amazon has a larger selection of ebooks than Barnes & Noble – so if you’re looking for a specific title, chances are it’ll be available on Amazon but not on B&N’s online store.

Sony 16-35 2.8 Vs Tamron 17-28


Tamron 17-28 Vs Sony 16-35 F4

When it comes to wide-angle lenses, there are two main contenders in the market – the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 and the Sony 16-35mm f/4. Both of these lenses offer a lot of features and are very popular choices among photographers. So, which one should you choose?

To start off, let’s take a look at the specs of each lens: Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8: – Aperture range: f/2.8-22

– Minimum focus distance: 11 inches (28cm) – Weight: 1.5 pounds (680g) Sony 16-35mm f/4:

– Aperture range: f/4-22 Minimum focus distance: 12 inches (30cm) Weight: 1 pound (460g) As you can see, both lenses have a similar aperture range and minimum focus distance. However, the Tamron lens is significantly heavier than the Sony lens.

So, if weight is a concern for you, then the Sony lens might be a better choice. Another important factor to consider is image quality. In this regard, both lenses are very good – but some reviewers say that the Tamron lens has an edge over the Sony lens in terms of sharpness and overall image quality.

So, if image quality is your top priority then the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 might be a better choice for you. One final thing to keep in mind is price – and in this area, the Sony 16-35mm f/4 definitely has an advantage over the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 . The Sony lens is currently selling for around $1,000 while the Tamron lens will set you back nearly $1,500 .

Keep Reading:


There are many things to consider when choosing between the Sony 16-35 2.8 and the Tamron 17-28. Both lenses are great for wide angle shots, but there are some key differences to take into account. The Sony is a bit wider at 16mm, while the Tamron goes to 28mm.

This can be important depending on what you’re trying to capture in your photo. The Sony also has a faster aperture of 2.8, while the Tamron is 4. This means that the Sony will let in more light, which can be helpful in low light situations or when you want to create a shallow depth of field effect.

The Tamron does have image stabilization though, which can be beneficial if you’re shooting handheld or in other challenging conditions. Ultimately, it’s important to try out both lenses and see which one works better for your needs and shooting style.

Leave a Comment