When it comes to wide-angle lenses, there are a few options out there that stand out from the rest. The Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM and Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art are two of the best on the market, and they each have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. In this article, we’ll take a look at how these two lenses compare in terms of image quality, build quality, price, and more.
It’s no secret that Sony and Sigma are two of the most popular camera brands on the market. So when it comes to choosing a wide-angle lens, which one should you choose? The Sony 16-35mm GM or the Sigma 14-24mm?
Both lenses are great choices for anyone looking for a high-quality wide-angle lens. But there are some key differences between them that you should be aware of before making your decision. The Sony 16-35mm GM is a bit wider than the Sigma 14-24mm, giving you a bit more flexibility when framing your shots.
It also has a slightly longer focal length, meaning you can get closer to your subject without losing too much of the scene in your frame. And thanks to its G Master designation, you know that this lens is built with professional photographers in mind. On the other hand, the Sigma 14-24mm is lighter and smaller than the Sony 16-35mm GM, making it easier to carry around with you on location shoots.
It also has a slightly faster aperture, meaning you can let in more light and capture sharper images even in low light conditions. Plus, its price tag is significantly lower than the Sony lens, making it a more budget-friendly option. So which one should you choose?
Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what type of photography you plan on doing most often. If weight and size are important factors for you, then go with the Sigma 14-24mm. But if image quality is your top priority, then splurge on the Sony 16-35mm GM – it’s worth every penny.
Sigma 14-24mm Art Lens VS Sony 16-35mm G Master Lens // Sony A7 III A7R III A7R IV
Is Sigma Lens Better Than Sony Lens?
When it comes to lenses, there are a few different manufacturers that stand out from the rest. Sigma and Sony are two of the most popular brands on the market, and for good reason. Both companies produce high quality products that are backed by years of research and development.
So, when it comes to choosing between Sigma and Sony lenses, which is better? There is no easy answer to this question as it depends on a number of factors. For example, what type of photography do you plan on doing?
If you need a lens for landscape photography, then a Sigma lens might be a better option. However, if you need a lens for portrait photography, then a Sony lens might be a better choice. It really all comes down to your specific needs and preferences.
Another factor to consider is price. Sigma lenses tend to be more affordable than Sony lenses, so if budget is a concern then Sigma might be the way to go. However, keep in mind that cheaper doesn’t always mean better.
In some cases, you might get what you pay for with Sigma lenses. Ultimately, there is no definitive answer as to whether Sigma or Sony lenses are better. It really depends on your individual needs and preferences as a photographer.
Do your research and make sure you choose the right lens for your particular style of photography!
Is Sony 16 35 Gm Worth It?
If you’re a Sony shooter, the short answer is yes, the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM is worth it. It’s an excellent ultra-wide angle zoom lens that offers superb image quality, fast and precise autofocus, and weather-sealed build quality. It’s not perfect – there’s some noticeable distortion at 16mm and it’s quite a hefty lens – but overall it’s a great option for landscape, architectural, and interior photography.
For those unfamiliar with the GM designation, Sony’s G Master lenses are its flagship line of professional-grade optics. They’re designed to offer the highest possible image quality, along with fast and accurate autofocus performance. The 16-35mm f/2.8 GM is one of four ultra-wide angle zoom lenses currently in Sony’s lineup (the others being the 12-24mm f/4 G, 24-70mm f/2.8 GM, and 70-200mm f/2.8 GM), and it sits at the top of the range in terms of both price and performance.
So what makes the 16-35mm f/2.8 GM so special? Let’s take a look at some of its key features: Ultra wide angle field of view: The 16-35mm focal length range gives you an ultra wide field of view that’s perfect for capturing sweeping landscapes or large group shots.
At 35mm it’s still wide enough for many types of general purpose photography too. Fast maximum aperture: The constant f/2.8 maximum aperture means this lens performs well in low light conditions and also allows you to achieve shallow depth of field effects if desired.
Excellent image quality: Thanks to its advanced optical design (which includes three aspherical elements and two extra low dispersion elements) as well asSony’a Nano AR Coating technology, the 16-35mm delivers extremely sharp images with minimal chromatic aberration throughout its entire focal length range .
Weather sealed construction: Like all G Master lenses ,the16 -35 mm has been designedfor professional useand can withstand heavy duty usein tough weather conditions thanks toits robust dustand moistureresistantconstruction .
Is the Sigma 14 24 A Full Frame?
No, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG HSM Art is not a full frame lens. It is designed for APS-C cameras with a 1.6x crop factor, which means that it will have a field of view equivalent to 22.4-38.4mm on a full frame camera.
Does Sigma 14 24 Have Image Stabilization?
No, the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG HSM Art Lens does not have image stabilization.
Sony 20Mm 1.8 Vs Sigma 14-24
There are many factors to consider when choosing between the Sony 20mm 1.8 and the Sigma 14-24. Here are some key points to help you make your decision: -The Sony 20mm is a prime lens, meaning it has a fixed focal length and cannot zoom in or out.
The Sigma 14-24 is a zoom lens, meaning it can be adjusted to different focal lengths. -The Sony 20mm has a maximum aperture of f/1.8, while the Sigma 14-24 has a maximum aperture of f/2.8. This means that the Sony will let in more light, making it better for low light situations.
However, the Sigma will have shallower depth of field, which can be desirable for certain types of photography. -The Sony 20mm is smaller and lighter than the Sigma 14-24. This makes it more portable and easier to carry around with you.
Ultimately, the decision between these two lenses comes down to what you intend to use them for. If you need a versatile zoom lens for landscape or architectural photography, then the Sigma is probably the better choice.
When it comes to wide-angle lenses for Sony cameras, there are two main contenders: the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM and the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art. Both lenses are extremely sharp, but there are some key differences that may make one lens a better choice for you than the other.
The Sony 16-35mm GM is a bit wider at 16mm, while the Sigma 14-24mm starts at 14mm.
The extra 2mm of width can be helpful when shooting landscapes or architecture, as you’ll be able to fit more into the frame. The Sony lens is also slightly lighter and smaller, making it a bit more portable. However, the Sigma lens has a few advantages over the Sony option.
First, it has an integrated filterslot that allows you to use ND filters without needing an adapter. Second, its autofocus system is faster and quieter than the Sony’s. Finally, its distortion correction is better than theSony’s, meaning your images will have less barrel distortion at the edges.
So which lens is right for you? If weight and size are your main concerns, go withthe Sony 16-35mm GM.