Sony 16-35 Gm Vs Tamron 17-28: Key Differences

There are a lot of great reasons to buy a Sony 16-35 Gm or Tamron 17-28. They are both excellent wide angle lenses that can produce amazing images. However, there are some key differences between the two lenses that may make one more suitable for your needs than the other.

In the world of wide-angle lenses, there are two that stand out above the rest: the Sony 16-35mm GM and the Tamron 17-28mm. Both of these lenses are exceptional, but which one is the best? To answer that question, we need to compare them side-by-side.

First, let’s look at the specs. The Sony 16-35mm GM has a maximum aperture of f/2.8, while the Tamron 17-28mm has a maximum aperture of f/2.8 as well. So, in terms of light gathering ability, they’re equal.

The Sony 16-35mm GM has a minimum focal length of 16mm and a maximum focal length of 35mm. The Tamron 17-28mm has a minimum focal length of 17mm and a maximum focal length of 28mm. So, the Sony lens is slightly wider angle than the Tamron lens.

Now let’s look at image quality. Both lenses are extremely sharp, but the Sony 16-35mm GM seems to have an edge in this department. There is less vignetting and chromatic aberration with the Sony lens, and overall it produces images that are just slightly sharper than those from the Tamron lens.

So, which one should you buy? If you’re looking for a top quality wide-angle lens and money is no object, then go for the Sony 16-35mm GM. However, if you’re on a budget but still want excellent image quality, then go for the Tamron 17-28mm instead – it’s nearly as good as its more expensive rival but significantly cheaper too!

Is Tamron 17-28mm BETTER Than Sony GM 16-35mm?! | $900 VS $2200

Which Lens is Better for Landscape Photography, the Sony 16-35Mm Gm Or the Tamron 17-28Mm

There is no easy answer when it comes to choosing the best lens for landscape photography. Both the Sony 16-35mm GM and Tamron 17-28mm lenses have their pros and cons. Ultimately, the decision of which lens to use comes down to personal preference and what you want to achieve with your photos.

The Sony 16-35mm GM is a great all-around lens that can be used for a variety of different types of photography, including landscape. One of the main benefits of this lens is its wide field of view, which allows you to capture more of the scene in front of you. It also has a fast maximum aperture of f/2.8, which gives you the ability to shoot in low light conditions or create shallow depth of field effects.

On the downside, this lens is quite expensive, retailing for around $2500 USD. The Tamron 17-28mm is another excellent option for landscape photography. This lens also has a wide field of view and fast maximum aperture, making it well suited for shooting in difficult lighting conditions.

However, one advantage that the Tamron 17-28mm has over the Sony 16-35mm GM is its price point; at around $1200 USD, it’s much more affordable than its Sony counterpart.

What are the Main Differences between These Two Lenses

When it comes to lenses, there are a few key differences between the two most popular types:prime and zoom. Prime lenses are typically faster, offer better image quality, and have a wider field of view than zoom lenses. They also tend to be more expensive and less versatile.

Zoom lenses, on the other hand, are more affordable and offer more flexibility when it comes to focal length. However, they are usually slower and don’t perform as well in low light conditions. So, which type of lens is right for you?

It really depends on your needs and budget. If you need a fast lens with great image quality, a prime lens is probably your best bet. But if you’re looking for something more affordable that still offers decent performance, then a zoom lens might be a better option.

Which One Should I Buy If I Want to Use It for Both Landscapes And Astrophotography

If you’re looking to buy a camera for both landscapes and astrophotography, there are a few things you’ll want to keep in mind. First, consider what kinds of images you want to be able to capture. If you’re mainly interested in landscape photography, look for a camera with features that will help you capture beautiful scenery, like a wide-angle lens and high resolution.

If astrophotography is your main interest, look for a camera with low-light performance and the ability to capture long exposures. Once you’ve decided what kind of photographer you are, it’s time to start considering which camera is right for you. There are many great cameras on the market that are suitable for both landscape and astrophotography, so it really comes down to personal preference.

Some things you might want to keep in mind include price, brand preference, and whether or not you want a DSLR or mirrorless camera. No matter what kind of photographer you are or what your budget is, there’s sure to be a great camera out there that’s perfect for capturing both landscapes and astrophotography. Do some research and find the one that best suits your needs!

Tamron 17-28 Vs Sony 16-35 F4

When it comes to wide-angle lenses, there are a few different options available on the market. Two of the most popular choices are the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD and Sony 16-35mm f/4 Zeiss Vario-Tessar T*. So, which one should you choose?

Well, it really depends on what you’re looking for in a lens. If you need something that is lightweight and compact, then the Sony 16-35mm f/4 would be a good choice. However, if you’re wanting something with a bit more zoom power and light gathering ability, then the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 would be a better option.

So, which one is right for you? It really depends on your needs and what you’re looking for in a lens. But no matter which one you choose, you’ll be getting an excellent wide-angle lens that will help you capture stunning photos and videos!

More Read:

Sony 16-50Mm Vs Sony 18-135Mm – Difference and Comparison


When deciding between the Sony 16-35 GM and the Tamron 17-28, there are a few things to keep in mind. The Sony is a bit wider at 16mm, while the Tamron is slightly longer at 28mm. Both lenses are very sharp, but the Sony has less distortion and vignetting.

The Tamron is also weather resistant, which may be a factor if you plan on shooting in inclement conditions. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what you plan on using the lens for.

Leave a Comment