Tamron 17-28 Vs Sigma 14-24 – Difference and Comparison

There’s a lot of debate in the Sony world about which ultra-wide zoom is best. The two most popular options are the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD and the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 Art. Both lenses have their pros and cons, so it can be hard to decide which one is right for you.

In this blog post, we’ll compare the two lenses and help you make a decision based on your needs.

When it comes to choosing a wide-angle lens for your Sony camera, you may be wondering whether to go for the Tamron 17-28mm or the Sigma 14-24mm. Both lenses offer great image quality and a wide field of view, so it can be tough to decide which one is right for you. Here’s a quick rundown of the main differences between these two lenses:

– The Tamron 17-28mm has a slightly wider field of view than the Sigma 14-24mm. This can be useful if you want to capture more of a scene in your frame, or if you’re shooting in tight spaces. – The Sigma 14-24mm has a slightly faster maximum aperture (f/2.8 vs f/3.5 on the Tamron).

This means that it will let in more light, making it better suited to low light photography. It also gives you more control over depth of field, allowing you to create images with dreamy background blur. So, which lens should you choose?

Ultimately, it comes down to what kind of photography you plan on doing most often. If you think you’ll benefit from the extra wideness offered by the Tamron 17-28mm, then go for that one. But if you think the faster aperture and greater control over depth of field will come in handy more often, then go for the Sigma 14-24mm instead.

Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART vs Tamron 17-28 for Sony: Review and Comparison

What are the Main Differences between the Tamron 17-28 And Sigma 14-24 Sony

The Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD Lens for Sony E-Mount is a wide-angle zoom lens that covers the popular focal length range of 17-28mm. With a maximum aperture of f/2.8, this lens is ideal for low light photography and can also produce some nice bokeh effects when used at its widest setting. The build quality of the lens is very good, with a metal barrel and weather-sealing to protect against the elements.

The autofocus system is fast and accurate, making this an excellent all-around lens for Sony mirrorless cameras. The Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG HSM Art Lens for Sony E Mount is another excellent option for Sony shooters looking for a wide-angle zoom lens. This lens has an even wider field of view than the Tamron, covering 14-24mm, and also has a fast maximum aperture of f/2.8.

The build quality is very good, with a solid metal construction that includes weather sealing to protect against the elements. The autofocus system is quick and accurate, making this another great choice for photographers who need a reliable wide-angle zoom lens.

Which One is Better for Landscape Photography

Mirrorless cameras or DSLR cameras? There is no simple answer as to whether mirrorless cameras or DSLR cameras are better for landscape photography. It depends on a variety of factors, including the specific needs and preferences of the photographer.

Some photographers may prefer the lighter weight and smaller size of mirrorless cameras, while others might prefer the longer battery life and faster autofocus of DSLRs. Ultimately, it is up to the individual photographer to decide which type of camera is best for their own landscape photography.

Which One is Better for Astrophotography

DSLR or Mirrorless Camera? DSLR cameras are typically better for astrophotography than mirrorless cameras. This is because DSLRs have larger sensors and can therefore capture more light, which is important when photographing faint objects in the night sky.

Additionally, DSLRs usually have longer shutter speeds than mirrorless cameras, meaning they can take longer exposures without introducing too much noise into the image.

What are the Pros And Cons of Each Lens

There are several types of camera lenses available on the market, each with its own set of pros and cons. Here is a quick rundown of some of the most popular types of lenses: Prime lenses: Prime lenses are fixed focal length lenses, meaning they cannot zoom in or out.

They are typically faster than zoom lenses (meaning they have a wider maximum aperture), and often produce sharper images. However, because you cannot zoom with a prime lens, you will need to physically move closer or further away from your subject in order to frame your shot correctly. This can sometimes be impractical, especially if your subject is moving.

Zoom lenses: Zoom lenses offer the convenience of being able to change your focal length without having to move your feet. This makes them ideal for candid photography or situations where you cannot get close to your subject. Zoom lenses also tend to be slower than prime lenses (meaning they have a narrower maximum aperture), which can make them more difficult to use in low-light conditions.

Wide-angle lenses: Wide-angle lenses have a very wide field of view, making them great for landscape photography or other shots where you want to capture a lot of detail in one frame. However, because wide-angle lens distort straight lines, they are not ideal for portraiture or other shots where you want your subjects to look their best. Telephoto lenses: Telephoto lens allow you take close-up photos without having to physically move closer to your subject.

This makes them ideal for wildlife or sports photography, when getting close enough would be impractical or dangerous.

Tamron 17-28 Vs Sigma 14-24 Sony

Credit: www.lightandmatter.org

Tamron 17-28 Vs Sony 16-35

There’s a lot to like about both the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM and the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD for Sony E-mount cameras. They’re both very sharp, have fast and accurate autofocus, and are relatively compact and lightweight for their focal length range and maximum aperture. So, which one is right for you?

The first thing to consider is price. The Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM costs around $3,000, while the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD can be had for less than half that amount at around $1,400. If price is your primary consideration, then the Tamron is the clear winner here.

But there are some other things to consider as well. For instance, the Sony has a slightly wider field of view at 16mm vs 17mm on the Tamron. It also has slightly less vignetting (dark corners) at wide apertures and its autofocus system is marginally faster and quieter.

On the other hand, the Tamron lens has better build quality with weather sealing and a more robust zoom mechanism that feels smoother in use. Plus, it comes with a handy built-in petal-type lens hood that can be reversed for storage whereas the Sony doesn’t come with a hood at all (you’ll have to buy one separately). So, which one should you buy?


When it comes to wide-angle zoom lenses for Sony full-frame mirrorless cameras, there are two obvious choices: the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD and the Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG HSM Art. Both lenses offer similar specs and performance, but which one is the better choice? In terms of build quality, the Tamron lens is slightly lighter and smaller than the Sigma lens.

The Tamron lens also has a weather-sealed construction, while the Sigma lens does not. However, the Sigma lens has a more robust and solid feel to it. In terms of image quality, both lenses are excellent.

They both have very good sharpness, color rendition, and contrast. There is very little difference between them in terms of image quality. The main difference between these two lenses lies in their autofocus performance.

The Tamron lens uses an ultrasonic motor for fast and silent autofocus, while the Sigma lens uses a slower but more precise stepping motor. In terms of autofocus speed and accuracy, the Tamron lens is slightly better than the Sigma lens. Overall, either of these lenses would be a great choice for a Sony full-frame mirrorless camera user who wants a high-quality wide-angle zoom lens.

Leave a Comment