Tamron 17-28 Vs Sony 16-35 F4 – Difference and Comparison

The Tamron 17-28 and Sony 16-35 F4 wide angle lenses are both excellent choices for landscape photography. They both have similar specs, with a maximum aperture of f/4 and a minimum focal length of 16mm. However, there are some key differences between these two lenses.

The Tamron 17-28 is slightly lighter and smaller than the Sony 16-35, making it more portable. It also has a shorter minimum focus distance, meaning you can get closer to your subject matter. On the other hand, the Sony 16-35 has image stabilization built in, which can be helpful when shooting in low light conditions or at longer shutter speeds.

Ultimately, both of these lenses are great choices for landscape photography; it just depends on your specific needs and preferences.

There’s a lot to love about both the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD and the Sony 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario-Tessar T* FE, but which one is the best for you? Here’s a quick comparison of these two popular ultrawide angle lenses to help you make your decision. Both lenses offer excellent image quality, with the Tamron offering slightly better edge-to-edge sharpness and less vignetting.

The Sony lens has a bit more distortion, but its autofocus system is faster and quieter. The biggest difference between these two lenses is their maximum aperture. The Tamron has a wide open aperture of f/2.8, while the Sony maxes out at f/4.

This means that the Tamron will perform better in low light situations and can create shallower depth of field effects. However, it also means that the Tamron is significantly bigger and heavier than the Sony lens. So, which one should you choose?

If size and weight are your top priorities, then go with the Sony 16-35mm f/4 lens. But if you need that extra stop of light gathering power or want to create dreamy background blur effects, then go with the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD lens.

Tamron 17-28 F2.8 VS Sony Zeiss 16-35 F4 LENS COMPARISON

Which One is Better

There are many things to consider when trying to decide whether one thing is better than another. In the case of comparing two things, it is important to think about what qualities each thing has and how those qualities compare to each other. Additionally, it can be helpful to consider what you personally value in order to make a decision that is best for you.

When it comes to deciding which is better, there is no easy answer. It depends on what you are looking for and what matters most to you. If you are trying to decide between two things, it can be helpful first of all to make a list of pros and cons for each option.

Once you have done that, you can start to weigh the different factors against each other to see which option comes out on top. For example, let’s say you are trying to decide between two different houses. One house has more square footage but costs more money, while the other house is smaller but cheaper.

To figure out which one is better, you would need first of all decide what is most important to you – size or cost? If size is more important, then the first house would be the better option despite being more expensive. However, if cost is more important than size then the second house would be better since it costs less money even though it’s smaller.

In short, there is no easy answer as to which one is better without knowing more about your specific situation and preferences!

What are the Main Difference between These Two Lenses?

There are a few key differences between these two types of lenses. First, fisheye lenses have a much wider field of view than rectilinear lenses. This is because fisheye lenses curve the image in order to fit more into the frame.

This can be both an advantage and a disadvantage depending on what you’re trying to photograph. It also means that objects in the center of the frame will appear larger than those on the edges. Another difference is that fisheye lenses typically have shorter focal lengths than rectilinear lenses.

This gives them a wider angle of view, but it also means they aren’t able to focus on objects as far away. Finally, fisheye lenses often create distortion around the edges of the frame while rectilinear lenses do not. This is due to the way that light bends when it passes through a curved lens.

Why Should I Choose One Over the Other

There are a few things to consider when choosing between an online or brick-and-mortar college. The first is your learning style. If you prefer a more hands-on approach, then a brick-and-mortar college might be a better fit for you.

You’ll also have the opportunity to meet with professors and other students in person, which can be beneficial. However, if you prefer a more independent learning style, then an online college could be a better option. You’ll have more flexibility when it comes to completing coursework and won’t need to commute to campus.

Another consideration is cost. In general, online colleges are cheaper than brick-and-mortar colleges because there are no costs associated with things like room and board. However, this isn’t always the case so it’s important to do your research before making a decision.

Make sure to also consider financial aid options at both types of schools before making your final decision. The last thing to keep in mind is your career goals. If you know what you want to do after graduation, then choose the school that will best prepare you for that career path.

For example, if you want to be a teacher, then attending a brick-and-mortar college with strong education programs would make sense. Alternatively, if you want to work in the tech industry, then an online college with stronger computer science programs might be a better choice. Ultimately, there is no right or wrong answer when it comes to choosing between an online or brick-and-mortar college – it all depends on your individual needs and preferences.

Consider all of the factors listed above before making your decision so that you can choose the school that’s right for you!

Tamron 17-28 Vs Sony 16-35 F4

Credit: www.cameraray.com

Tamron 17-28 Vs Sony 16-35 F4

When it comes to wide-angle lenses, two of the most popular options on the market are the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 and Sony 16-35mm f/4.0. But which one is the better option? To help you make your decision, we’ve put together a side-by-side comparison of these two lenses.

Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8: – Aperture range: f/2.8-22 – Minimum focus distance: 11 inches (28cm)

– Weight: 1.6 pounds (725g) Sony 16-35mm f/4.0: Aperture range: f/4.0-22 Minimum focus distance: 12 inches (30cm) Weight: 1 pound (455g) As you can see, there are some key differences between these two lenses. The Tamron 17-28mm has a wider aperture range, allowing you to capture more light and create shallower depth of field effects.

It also has a shorter minimum focus distance, making it easier to get up close and personal with your subjects.


When it comes to wide-angle lenses, there are two main contenders in the market: the Sony 16-35mm f/4 and the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8. Both lenses offer a lot of features and benefits for photographers, but which one is the better option? In terms of overall quality, the Tamron lens is slightly better than the Sony lens.

The Tamron lens has a wider aperture, which allows for more light to enter the camera and results in sharper images. The Tamron lens also has better build quality, with a weather-sealed design that makes it more resistant to damage from the elements. However, the Sony lens has some advantages over the Tamron lens as well.

Firstly, the Sony lens is cheaper than the Tamron lens. Secondly, the Sony lens is lighter and smaller than the Tamron lens, making it more convenient to carry around. Thirdly, although both lenses have image stabilization built-in, the Sony system is slightly better at reducing camera shake.

So, which wide-angle lens should you buy?

Leave a Comment