Tamron 17-28Mm Vs Sony 16-35Mm: Which best suits you?

There’s a lot of debate in the photography world about which lens is better for wide-angle shots, the Tamron 17-28mm or the Sony 16-35mm. Both lenses have their pros and cons, so it really depends on what you’re looking for in a lens. Here’s a breakdown of each lens to help you decide which one is right for you.

When it comes to wide angle lenses, the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD and Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM are two of the most popular options on the market. But which one is the best? In terms of optics, both lenses are excellent.

The Tamron has 20 elements in 13 groups, while the Sony has 16 elements in 11 groups. Both lenses have an aperture range of f/2.8-22. The Tamron is a bit lighter than the Sony, weighing in at 630g compared to 805g for the Sony.

The Tamron is also slightly smaller, with a diameter of 77mm compared to 83mm for the Sony. When it comes to price, the Tamron is significantly cheaper than the Sony, with a retail price of $1199 compared to $2499 for the Sony lens. So, which one should you buy?

If price is no object, then either lens would be a great choice. However, if you’re on a budget, then theTamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD is an excellent option that won’t break the bank.

Is Tamron 17-28mm BETTER Than Sony GM 16-35mm?! | $900 VS $2200

What is the Difference between the Tamron 17-28Mm And Sony 16-35Mm Lenses

If you’re in the market for a new wide-angle lens, you may be wondering whether to choose the Tamron 17-28mm or Sony 16-35mm. Both lenses are excellent choices for landscape and architectural photography, but there are some key differences between them. The most obvious difference is that the Tamron 17-28mm has a slightly wider field of view than the Sony 16-35mm.

That extra bit of width can be helpful when composing shots, especially if you’re shooting in tight spaces. Another difference is that the Tamron 17-28mm has a fixed f/2.8 aperture, while the Sony 16-35mm has a variable aperture that ranges from f/4 at its widest setting to f/22 at its narrowest. Having a fixed aperture is generally considered an advantage because it makes it easier to predict how your photos will turn out and allows you to use faster shutter speeds in low light conditions.

However, the tradeoff is that the Tamron 17-28mm is significantly heavier and more expensive than the Sony 16-35mm. So, which lens is right for you? If weight and cost are not concerns, then the Tamron 17-28mm is probably the better choice thanks to its wider field of view and fixed aperture.

But if you’re looking for a lighter and less expensive option, then the Sony 16-35mm may be a better fit.

The Tamron Has a Wider Field of View, Making It Better for Landscape And Architectural Photography, While the Sony is Better Suited for Portraits And Other General Photography

If you’re a photographer who likes to shoot a little bit of everything, then the Sony 85mm f/1.8 lens is a great option for your kit. But if you find yourself shooting mostly landscapes or architecture, then the Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di OSD might be a better choice for you. Here’s a breakdown of the key differences between these two lenses to help you make your decision:

The first thing to note is that the Sony 85mm has a much narrower field of view than the Tamron 17-35mm. That means that when framing up your shots, you’ll have less room to work with on the Sony lens. This can be an advantage or disadvantage depending on what type of photography you like to do.

If you often find yourself needing to crop in post-processing anyway, then the narrower field of view might not be an issue for you. But if you prefer composing your shots in-camera and don’t like cropping later, then the wider field of view offered by the Tamron lens will give you more flexibility. Another big difference between these two lenses is their maximum aperture settings.

The Sony 85mm has a maximum aperture of f/1.8 while the Tamron 17-35mm has a maximum aperture of f/2.8 at its widest setting (17mm) and f/4 at its longest setting (35mm). What this means is that when shooting in low light conditions, the Sony lens will perform better since it can let in more light. However, keep in mind that with wider apertures comes shallower depth of field, so if you’re looking to shoot portraits with nice bokeh effects, then again, the Sony 85mm will be better suited for that purpose.

Finally, one last thing to consider is price point. The Sony 85mm retails for around $600 while the Tamron 17-35mm goes for about $950 . So if budget is a concern for you, then obviously the Sony lens is going to be more appealing.

Tamron 17-28Mm Vs Sony 16-35Mm

Credit: www.youtube.com

Tamron 16-35Mm F 2.8 Sony

Tamron’s 16-35mm F2.8 Di III RXD is a wide-angle zoom lens for Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras. It offers a fast maximum aperture and is weather-sealed. With a field of view that ranges from 97 degrees to 63 degrees, this lens is ideal for landscape, architectural, and interior photography.

The minimum focus distance is 11 inches (28 cm), and the lens has an 82mm filter thread. The Tamron 16-35mm F2.8 Di III RXD uses 17 elements in 12 groups, including one aspherical element and three low dispersion elements. This construction helps to minimize distortion and chromatic aberrations.

The autofocus system uses a stepping motor which makes it quiet and smooth, making it ideal for video applications as well as stills photography. This lens also has Tamron’s BBAR (Broad-Band Anti-Reflection) Coating to reduce ghosting and flares.

Conclusion

When it comes to wide-angle lenses, the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD and the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM are two of the most popular options on the market. But which one is better? In terms of overall quality, the Tamron lens is a bit sharper than the Sony lens, especially at 17mm.

It also has less distortion and chromatic aberration. However, the Sony lens has slightly better corner sharpness and less vignetting. In terms of build quality, the Tamron lens is a bit lighter and more compact than the Sony lens.

It also has weather sealing, which is a nice bonus. However, the Sony lens feels a bit more solid and durable. So, which one should you buy?

If you’re looking for the best possible image quality, go with the Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD. If you’re looking for a more durable lens that’s still very good optically, go with the Sony 16-35mm f/2..

Leave a Comment